Visit our main site www.danga.biz

Thursday, July 23, 2009

A practical Implementation Framework for managing e-Business projects

The implementation of Electronic Business (Electronic Ordering and Invoicing) influences the strategic position of companies. It enables organizations to communicate faster and more efficient with their trading partners. As such they become valuable partners for medium-sized and large companies that are already trading electronically, as well as for those considering making the leap into e-Business (e-Ordering and e-Invoicing).

Although there are many software solutions and service providers available companies should realize that implementing e-Business is still a considerable endeavor and should not be done 'overnight'.

The implementation of e-Business requires companies to align processes and information flows across inter-enterprise business partners. Therefore a good understanding of these (inter-) enterprise business processes, data exchange standards, communication and integration architectures, and last but not least legal and fiscal regulations is crucial. Furthermore companies should structure their implementation of e-Business as a global project, establish a shared vision on the future e-Business model and agree upon the implementation approach.

Organizations need a proven methodology to guide their implementation project from inception to onboarding. Such an e-business implementation methodology emerged in recent years from acquired knowledge and real lessons learned upon completing e-Business projects. The methodology is a framework that can be applied to all e-Business implementation projects irrespective of the type of business. The focus of the methodology is on creating a series of value-adding successes by taking small manageable steps aimed at enhancing the knowledge and confidence of the organization in e-Business.

The e-Business Implementation Framework consists of 7 stages:
- Vision Study (V.S.)
- Feasibility Study (F.S.)
- Start Up (S.U.)
- Initiate (I.P.)
- Execute (E.P.)
- Close (C.P.)
- Operate

In addition the framework provides ready-to-use project templates and practical guidelines.

Companies can go through the stages and execute the steps that are appropriate with respect to their personal situation. It is advised to go at least through the 7 stages and validate whether the desired deliverables are present in the company.

Vision Study
Before jumping on the bandwagon organizations need a better understanding of the available e-Business distribution models and solutions. Moreover it is imperative for companies to determine a broadly-shared vision on e-business. This vision should reflect the core values and common beliefs of the organization and present the aspirations and strategic direction for the future of the company.

As a first step organizations need to identify and bring together the main decision-makers from all departments and business units. These stakeholders are jointly responsible for defining the vision statement of the company. This task imposes a huge challenge upon participants and demands for an open and collaborative workspace where people are free to express their opinions.

A one-day vision workshop is an excellent way to establish an open and inspiring dialogue between stakeholders. Stakeholders will have to perform a variety of task-oriented activities to arrive at a strong vision statement. The outcome or deliverables of the vision workshop are:
- understanding of e-Business concepts
- overview of core values and common beliefs
- list of preferred e-Business models
- broadly-shared vision statement

The process of building a vision statement starts with learning to know e-Business concepts and understand the difference between business services and exchange services with respect to purchase-to-pay and order-to-cash processes. This knowledge and understanding enables stakeholders to determine their current position and identify their desired future model(s).

Working towards a broadly-shared vision requires stakeholders to align the values and beliefs of different organizational units that have their own identity and behavior. The stakeholders representing these units will have to set aside their differences and come up with one agreed set of core values and common beliefs. These values and beliefs should be formulated in the best interest of the company and its business partners.

During the process participants are encouraged to share the perspectives and experiences of their departments and to elaborate on their thoughts and ambitions. This open minded and collaborative spirit leads to creative and innovative ideas bringing out the best in people resulting in a list of preferred e-Business models.

At the end of the workshop a broadly-shared and sustainable vision naturally emerges from the collective mind-set of all stakeholders. Once the vision statement is formalized the stakeholders should determine the final list of preferred models and solutions, and define the goals (expectations) and objectives of the company with respect to e-Business.

The deliverables from the workshop provide the foundation and direction for the remaining activities in the Vision Study such as analyzing the maturity of the company.

After the Vision Workshop organizations need to get a better understanding of their Enterprise Architecture. This knowledge enables organizations to identify the models and solutions that they find most suitable for their company.

The Enterprise Architecture comprises two important domain areas that require further investigation:
- Business Domain
- ICT Landscape

Some organizations have already a clear view on these domain areas and only need to leverage their available knowledge. Others still have to investigate and describe their Enterprise Architecture.

With respect to e-Business these investigations will be high level with a strong focus on the core capabilities and consist of:
- Desk Research: the available information is studied and questions are prepared for the interview sessions.

- Interviews: architects and managers are interviewed to gather more information about the domain elements.

- Reporting: high level diagrams, process flows and models are assembled.

The core capabilities, called Foundation Capabilities, which form part of each domain, are:

- Business Domain
1) Organization
The organizational entities that operate and are responsible for the business processes, including governance and security. management teams, staff positions, roles, functions, competences, knowledge and skills are important to identify across the enterprise and trading partners, the external business environment.

2) Processes
The Business Processes that generate and support the flow of information and goods or services between two or more partners in a value chain. These are mainly Purchase-to-Pay and Order-to-Cash processes including sub-processes such as transport and tax reporting. Identifying the different processes and procedures as well as responsibilities is important.

3) Locations
The geographical location of business units and organizational entities e.g. Distribution Centers, Sales Offices and Manufacturing Plants.

[4) Governance]

[5) Security]

- ICT Landscape
1) Technology (Infrastructure)
The enabling technology that supports the operation of the processes and applications.

2) Information (Data and Standards)
The information architecture is about data & semantic interoperability. The data that is flowing trough the processes to accomplish the business functions and the standards used to support the information flows.

3) Applications (Systems)
The applications that enable the business processes to operate efficiently and handle the storage and retrieval of information.

The Enterprise studies are all about:
- What (data and entities)
- How (processes or functions)
- Where (locations and networks)
- Who (people)
- When (timing)
- Why (motivation).

Answers on these questions help in establishing a clear view on the maturity of the Enterprise Architecture and form the basis for determining the possible alternatives in which the organization can evolve with regards to e-Business initiatives.

These investigations can be executed by Enterprise Architects or Independent Technology Consultants. In preparation of the Maturity Assessment Workshop they will prepare the findings of the domain studies and draft two or more strategies to present and discuss.

Maturity Assessment Workshop
The Assessment Workshop should result into stakeholders understanding the current position of their organization and agree upon the next steps.

During the workshop all participants have to formalize the maturity level of the company, define and agree upon the improvements they would like to achieve in the domain areas.

Depending on the maturity level of the company and the clarity of the company's position, opposed to their partner’s, different routes are possible.

The stakeholders will have to indicate the routes to be explored more in depth during the Feasibility Study.

Feasibility Study
The decision for going for e-Business is based on the financial gains (benefits) and the costs for implementing the suggested program or solution. Moreover the decision depends on the business rationale for undertaking the project as expressed in the Business Case.

The objectives of the Feasibility Study are to identify the impact of selected business models and solutions on the Enterprise Architecture (Impact Analysis) and to determine the costs and benefits of the different scenario's (Cost & Benefit Analysis). The main deliverable of the Feasibility Study is the Business Case.

The role of the Business Case is that of a communication tool to facilitate proper decision making by the target stakeholders. The Business Case serves as the primary document for decision-making and should provide evidence that the project is a good investment for the company. The format and size of the Business Case are irrelevant, instead brevity and clarity are more important.

The Business Case should justify:
- Why a project should be undertaken ?
- Why a company should invest in the project ?
- Why the project represents a worthy expenditure of the company's funds

The Business Case should be correct, concise and unbiased. The target audience of the Business Case are busy executives. The following elements should be included in a Business Case:
- Executive or Project Summary
- Objectives of the Project
- Stakeholders
- Alternatives and Preferred Approach/Solution
- Expected Benefits
- Costs
- Risk Assessment
- Basic Plan of work and timeline

For e-Business projects a Cost & Benefit Analysis (CBA) is more useful than an ROI Analysis because CBA attempts to quantify both tangible (quantitative) and intangible (qualitative) costs and benefits.

The Business Case for e-Business builds mostly on quantitative savings such as lower costs for printing and mailing, increased data quality and reduction of processing time. These are tangible benefits that people can assess before and after the implementation.

Intangible benefits should be kept separately from tangible benefits and weighed differently. Apart from that one should develop a Business Case taking into account the financial culture of a company. In some companies including intangible benefits in the Business Case is just inappropriate and should not be done.

The costs of e-Business projects depend largely on the chosen e-Business model and the maturity level of the company. The Impact Analysis help organizations shed some light on their maturity and help them in developing their personal roadmap.

The total costs for an e-Business roadmap contains:
- Cost of investigation and studies

- Initial costs for establishing the solution

- Cost of onboarding management

Qualitative benefits from process improvements or compliancy with future external business requirements are hard to translate into financial savings or earnings. However when such benefits are made financially they can play an important decision factor and therefore should be taken into account.

For example:
- Being ready for e-Business, in several trade relations, becomes an obligation. The potential loss can be significant for companies.

- e-Business models can help in strengthen the brand name (digital branding), extend customer experience and increase sales opportunities.

The Project Mandate and the Business Case are the most important deliverables of the Feasibility Study. They will determine the next steps of the project.

In most e-Business projects there are a few options:
1) No valid Business Case (There are no savings at all or the return on investment is too long).

2) Start an R.F.I to obtain more information about available solutions and costs.

3) Start an e-Business integration project with one or more partners

4) Connect to an e-Business network operator.

Starting an R.F.I. is an investigation or consultancy project which eventually leads to an implementation project. The main goals however are to learn more about the available business solutions and providers to be better prepared for defining a roadmap.

Starting up an e-Business project
When starting an e-Business project organizations should first appoint the Project Board Executive (Project Director) and a Project Manager. Both will be responsible for the success of the project and adoption of the results by the organization.

Organizations need to know that managing e-Business projects requires extensive knowledge of inter-enterprise business processes, international standards, business -to-business integration systems, legal and fiscal regulations. Moreover good understanding of supply chain management principles as well as strong communication and collaboration skills are essential.

In many companies sales and client management take the lead in starting these kinds of projects and provide the Project Director. The Project Director is fully accountable and responsible for the success and has the power to make all decisions.

When searching for a Project Manager look for Business Consultants that keep up with the ongoing innovations in the e-Business domain and with the developments at the level of the European Commission and local government. Opt for Business Consultants that have been involved in earlier stages. They already possess extensive knowledge of the processes, data, systems and organization.

As the first step the Project Owner and the Project Manager should carefully identify the senior decision makers to make up the project board. Most of these decision makers will have participated in the vision workshop and are convinced of the necessity of the project. However designing the Project Management Team Structure requires also involving stakeholders that question the need of the project.

Project Managers are advised to set up a Reference Team, which acts as a reference control board and is able to validate the impact of proposed changes on operation. The Reference Team consists of operational team leaders whom will support adoption of the project results. They will also need to take away the doubts of certain stakeholders.

It is also good and beneficial to install a Quality Assurance Team to monitor the quality of deliverables. When the team is headed by the manager accounting and/or human resource management they can also ensure budget and resourcing issues are adequately managed in a timely manner reducing uncertainty and eliminating responsibility discussions. As an example: Negotiations and discussions about availability and rates of resources should not be a task of the Project Manager instead Resource Management should take care of these. However Project Managers may not neglect these because they are responsible for the budget(s).

Based upon above considerations a typical Project Management Team structure looks as follows:

Please stay tuned more will follow in the next coming months after the holidays

Tags van Technorati:

Last updated: 26-11-2011

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Are European companies ready for managing inter-enterprise business processes ?

The last years businesses have experienced processes and information exchanges becoming more and more integrated and inter-related. Globalisation of activities is pushing companies to implement collaborative solutions to support their inter-enterprise business processes.

The growing adoption of Service Oriented Architectures and the advent of Business Ecosystems requires companies to re-consider their core competences. Investments in building these kind of complex communication platforms are huge while innovation is going fast these days. A number of risks that most companies are not willing to take. Instead they will increase the continuing need to focus on core business processes and will try to outsource as much as possible non-business specific functionality.

While the dividing line between internal and external processes and business data is blurring there are best practices emerging based on innovative integration technologies. The concept of Open Source is driving innovation and transformation of ICT solutions through global collaboration where Open Standards play an important role in speeding up adoption. Making innovation work is one of the important aspect of strategic business development in the world of today.

In the coming years Open Source is going to dictate what tools Businesses are going to use to support and manage their business processes. At the same time the distinction between Business-to-Business Collaboration and Integration Platforms and ERP systems will vanish. Since these systems will emerge into Collaborative and Intelligent Process and Information Management Solutions. Modularity and componentisation will be the keywords and provide an answer to the question "How to implement these Digital Business Ecosystems and leverage investments in existing ERP and integration systems?".

Especially in the integration world several Open Source oriented Companies are establishing modular component-based platforms that integrate easily with web based solutions such as Salesforce.com.

The questions in the near future are about global Business Process & Intelligence Platforms for managing (inter-) enterprise business processes ?

Some of the Open Source solutions I have looked at during the last years fall in the categories:
- Open Source ERP systems
- Open Source Business-to-Business SOA Integration Tools
- Open Source Business Intelligence Tools

Open Source ERP systems
- Open For Business Project (Apache OFBiz) from the Apache Software Foundation.

OFBIZ is an Open Source enterprise automation software solution including: Open Source ERP, Open Source CRM, Open Source E-Business / E-Commerce, Open Source SCM, Open Source MRP and Open Source CMMS/EAM.

- JFire from NightLabs GmbH, a German company.

JFire is an Enterprise Resource Planning and Customer Relationship Management system and one of the most innovative and mature Open Source ERP solution available on the market. The JFire application server runs under JBoss and JFire uses an Eclipse based Client for accessing the server-based software.

Open Source Business-to-Business Integration Tools
- FUSE ESB from Progress Software, formerly a IONA Technologies product.

Progess FUSE contains an ESB (based on Apache ServiceMix), Message Broker (based on Apache ActiveMQ), Service Framework and Mediation Router. All of these components are based on Software from the Apache Software Foundation. The FUSE Integration Designer is an Eclipse-based tooling for Open Integration.

Progess Software is the worldwide leader in application middleware and SOA infrastructure (Progress Sonic ESB) and provides one of the most reliable and flexible integrated business application platforms available, Progress OpenEdge.

- Talend Open Data Solutions
Talend Data Integration leverages the open source model to make data integration available to all types of organizations, regardless of their size, level of expertise or budgetary constraints. Talend Open Studio includes native connectors for SAP and Oracle, integrates with Salesforce.com and supports data synchronisation between Microsoft Dynamics AX solutions.

- ChainBuilder Visual Enterprise Integration Solution from Bostech Corporation

Bostech provides healthcare organisations an extensible, scalable enterprise integration solution that integrates together enterprise and supply chain applications running on disparate hardware platforms and programming environments. A robust graphical development environment provides the perfect way to visually create the integration flow.

- Apache Stonehenge Incubator project

The most interesting new Apache Software Foundation incubator project is Apache Stonehenge. The aim of the Stonehenge project is to develop a set of sample applications to demonstrate seamless interoperability across multiple underlying platform technologies by using currently defined W3C and OASIS standard protocols. By having a set of sample applications, with multiple language and framework implementations will become a useful and important part of the SOA landscape. The project team consists of WSO2, Progress, Microsoft, Red Hat (probably JBoss related) members.

WSO2, the OxygenTank , has developed the WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) based on the Apache Synapse ESB and Carbon. Carbon is a composable SOA framework based on the Eclipse Equinox OSGi container.

What is a composable SOA platform? Its a platform where when you add new types of service, you can instantly do many things: secure them, try them out, configure logging, caching, throttling, statistics. Its a platform where every piece of metadata and configuration is stored consistently in a metadata Registry, with full versioning. So when you add new components and features, they fit into your SOA Governance model. Its a platform where you can mediate any service in a consistent way, without having to run a separate costly ESB. And its a platform where the administration UI seamlessly grows and extends to support just the function you need to know and work with.

Paul Frematle , CTO of WSO2, writes about WSO2 Carbon on his weblog

Open Source Business Intelligence Tools
- SpagoBI and Spagic from Engineering Ingegneria Informatica S.p.A.

SpagoBI is the unified Free Platform for the development of Business Intelligence solutions at enterprise level while Spagic is a SOA Enterprise Integration Platform composed by a set of visual tools and back-end applications to design develop and manage SOA/BPM solutions. Spagic provides out of the box SOA/ESB and BPM capabilities to end users/developers through its graphical environment. SpagoBI Studio is the new development environment based on Eclipse IDE. It allows the developer to design and maintain all the analytical documents.

What do these solutions have in common ?
What is very interesting is that all of these solutions have a few things in common:

- Community-driven solutions that are freely accessible for training and analysis purposes and have a high degree of stability and maturity.

- Based on Java and using Eclipse as the preferred development environment. In some cases they use Eclipse as a Rich Client (JFire) or they use Eclipse as the Development Environment for Integration Flows (Chainbuilder, FUSE Integration Designer, SpagoBI

- Based on components of the Apache Software Foundation such as Apache ServiceMix.

Apart from that most European Member States as well as Businesses have adopted Open Source solutions. Especially Open Source CRM solutions and Content Management systems are implemented on a large scale. Think about Sugar CRM and Alfresco.

Are Businesses prepared for this paradigm shift ?
Will Businesses be prepared for this paradigm shift that is facing us next week, next month or next year and are they able to collaborate across countries and jointly approach the market with innovative ideas and solutions ?

Tags van Technorati: ,,,

Last update: 26-11-2011

Monday, July 20, 2009

The new approach for bringing adoption of e-Invoicing by SMEs to the next level!

The European Commission on 28 January 2009 adopted a proposal to change the VAT Directive 2006/112/EC (from 28 November 2006) with respect to invoicing rules. The main objectives are to reduce burden on business, increase the use of e-Invoicing, support small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and help member states tackle fraud.

Regulatory requirements for Electronic Invoicing will change with the advent of the measures aimed at further simplifying, modernizing and harmonizing the VAT invoicing rules. The foundation of the proposal is based on “equal treatment of paper and electronic invoices” in a technologically neutral way by removing the conditions for an Advanced Electronic Signature (AES) and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI).

While in the world of electronic agreements and contracts the need for electronic signatures is apparent the reasoning is that e-Invoicing is part of a larger process where every process step contributes to authenticity and integrity of the trade transaction. Nevertheless many Member States will continue to believe these guarantees can only be provided by electronically signed e-invoices.

Therefore removing the requirement to guarantee the authenticity of origin and integrity of content by means of pre-defined technological solutions, such as EDI and Electronic Signatures, is the most challenging from a political and governmental perspective. It requires a “paradigm shift” in thinking about audit management processes and strategies by Tax Authorities.

Apart from that increasing the use of e-Invoicing requires more than simplification of VAT invoicing rules. Although standardization efforts in Europe are huge the progress of standards bodies is slow with respect to data exchange standards. In response new initiatives emerge from humble beginnings, underpinned by new technologies, with potential to grow into creatures of substance and significance. The a priori standard for e-Invoicing, UN/CEFACT, starts loosing ground due to the growing need for inclusion of all types of companies, the rigidity and slowness of development, and the increased adoption of the Universal Business Language (UBL) as the European data exchange standard.

Although everyone is entitled to their own opinion creating the next wave of e-Invoicing requires re-alignment of views and goals. Hence there are two fundamental questions to answer:
- What is understood by the term “Compliant e-Invoicing”?

- What do SME’s and large companies need to jump on the bandwagon of e-Invoicing?

What is Compliant e-Invoicing ?
One such definition comes from the CEN/ISSS and Fiscalis e-Invoicing Compliance Guidelines as expressed in the section “e-Invoicing Basics Introduction”. Compliant e-Invoicing is about auditability of invoicing processes, verification whether VAT obligations are met and whether the invoice is an accurate reflection of sales and purchases.

Many people believe that e-Invoicing is the first step towards full automation of the end-to-end-trade process. Talking about “Compliant e-Business (Electronic Business)” is more appropriate in view of drafting the rules for the near future.

What do SME’s need to adopt e-Invoicing ? It should be clear that e-Invoicing for SME’s and for large companies requires more than simplification of VAT invoicing rules. There is a need for a multi-purpose exchange standard that enables companies to participate regardless whether they are able to process the invoice data automatically in their financial system.

Such a multi-purpose exchange standard should incorporate a readable image and processable data in one packaged container.

Bringing adoption of the new VAT directives to the next level
The CEN/ISSS e-Invoicing Workgroup Phase II Task Group 2 on Compliance recently presented their e-Invoicing Compliance Guidelines. The CEN/ISSS Task Group 2 and the Fiscalis e-Audit Project Group are paving the way for harmonization of VAT - Compliant e-Invoicing processes.

The principles in “the Guidelines” stimulate the use of a single coherent Business Control Framework (BCF) - Tax Control Framework (TCF) - across Europe. The aim is to attain a sufficient degree of auditability and legal compliance of e-Invoicing from a Tax perspective and to provide a solid foundation for performing tax audits in situations where e-Invoicing solutions are used.

The Guidelines provide practitioners a perfect instrument for self-regulation and self-certification of processes and technologies that are used to ensure invoices are reliable. Primarily enabling organizations to prove that invoices are processed and stored correctly within their individual spheres of governance and liability.

However, if well-understood, “Compliant e-Invoicing” is not about auditing e-Invoicing solutions or Service Providers but about auditability of invoicing processes and fraud prevention by validating whether VAT transactions are accurately administered (paid and deducted). e-Invoicing is part of the total Purchase-To-Pay and Order-To-Cash cycle and orders, deliveries and receipts need to be registered for legally valid transactions.

For most companies the three-way match at the end of their cycle provides means to control the integrity of the content and the authenticity of origin.

The focus of the recommendations should therefore have been more on the auditability and validation of VAT transactions from a Tax Authority’s perspective instead of on auditability of e-Invoicing solutions and Service Providers.

Currently Tax Authorities lack functionality and information to validate whether tax deducted and tax paid are correct and therefore force companies to guarantee authenticity and integrity. Reducing fraud is only possible if Tax Authorities are able to validate sales and purchases, deliveries and receipts, as well as the related invoice and tax transactions between the different involved parties.

Bringing adoption of the new VAT directives to the next level requires a mind shift of Tax Authorities, internal and external Tax Auditors, Businesses and Solution / Service Providers. This “paradigm shift” in thinking about Tax audit management processes and strategies has an impact on all stakeholders.

They all need to consider and establish a new “Compliant e-Business (e-Invoicing) approach” with less focus on the processes and technologies used (technologically neutral) but more on the end-to-end-trade process.

The foundation of the new Compliant e-Business approach is based on two important concepts:
- e-Invoicing is part of a larger process
- a multi-purpose exchange standard

e-Invoicing is part of a larger process
Study of the Purchase-to-Pay (P2P) and Order-to-Cash (O2C) processes with respect to legal and auditability requirements, arising from VAT, manifest that one important step, the exchange of trade related transactions to Tax Authorities, is missing. Based on practical experience with implementing electronic ordering and invoicing architectures a few ideas evolved. These ideas need further widespread elaboration and buy-in from stakeholders to define strategies for development and realization.

Looking at the Purchase-to-Pay (P2P) and Order-to-Cash (O2C) processes e-Invoicing is the last step before payment takes place.

All these steps contribute to proving the authenticity and integrity of the trade transaction to involved business partners. Reporting VAT to Tax Authorities at current is not a part of the end-to-end-trade process in most European countries. As such from a Tax Authority’s viewpoint trade transactions are difficult to follow and validate.

The future of the new VAT directives requires re-defining the position and importance of e-Invoicing in view of the total trade process. New ways of reporting, processing and validating tax-related transactions as part of the total trade process are required. These new ways of working should provide trust to all parties and be easy to implement once standards and procedures are in place.

The new Compliant e-Invoicing approach is based on the act of reporting all financial Tax related transactions from the General Ledgers and Sub-ledgers of Suppliers and Customers in a timely manner to Tax Authorities. The data exchange standards for reporting tax related financial data already exists and are implemented in some European countries. However there is no commonly accepted standard across Europe. SAF-T and XBRL-GL are data standards that qualify for the goal of reporting the related transactions.

The end-to-end-trade process flow will include one of these standards for reporting of transactions to Tax Authorities including corrections made as result of disputes.

Establishing the new Compliant e-Invoicing approach will require all stakeholders to join forces and work together on extending Business and ICT architectures for inclusion of Tax Authorities.

In the Business domain the focus should be on administrative and process-oriented elements. Governments and Businesses will have to ensure that Tax reporting is adequately embedded in policies and laws. Most work has to be done in the ICT domain to ensure technology, information and applications support the new flow of information. All involved parties face significant investments in infrastructures, application systems and exchange standards.

However adoption of e-Invoicing in Europe with a view to the future advent of electronic business will only become successful when Tax Authorities have a clear and complete view on trade transactions. They will gain more control and better understanding of businesses. Moreover the technology drift of e-? will come to an end and businesses will applaud for the transparency in the end-to-end-trade process.

A multi-purpose exchange standard
At current when organizations want to establish e-Invoicing with all their trading partners they will have to send two types of documents: a data message and a readable image. This will introduce additional complexity at both sides because companies will have to deal with the different capabilities of their receiving and sending trading partners.

Global adoption of e-Invoicing requires a business and technical environment that enables all types of companies to participate regardless their capabilities and maturity.

The technical environment must provide reach to all their business partners irrespective of data exchange standards. Providing reach is not about connectivity but about being able to process the invoice content as an image or as data.

The multi-purpose exchange standard is an XML Data Package that contains a readable image and document data. The exchange standard requires a technical platform for generating the XML Data Package at the sending side and processing the data at the receiving side. Apart from that a reader for viewing the image is required for companies that are not able to process the data automatically in their financial applications.

There are potentially two solutions available that can be used as the basis for the multi-purpose exchange standard:
- the Adobe XDP (XML Data Package) format

- the OASIS Open Document format.

Both formats are XML-based containers that are able to support all of the available international data exchange standards. Although Adobe is much further in providing a total working solution, Open Document is based on an Open and Collaborative Community supported by several Open Source minded companies.

Still there is much work to do to ensure these solutions fully support the processing and transmission of the multi-purpose exchange standard.

Building the new Compliant e-Invoicing approach
Establishing the new Compliant e-Business (e-Invoicing) approach requires all stakeholders to support the development of Governmental and Business ICT architectures for reporting, processing and validating the tax related transactions.

These efforts include:
- a data exchange standard for tax related transactions based on SAF-T or XBRL-GL

- a European-wide infrastructure for the communication and storage of tax related transactions including Business Intelligence functionality for analyzing transactions reported by businesses across Europe

- interfaces for generating the data exchange messages from data stored in the General Ledgers and Sub-ledgers from the financial and ERP systems of Suppliers and Customers

Data Exchange Standard based on SAF-T or XBRL-GL
Compliant e-Invoicing will be valid for all types of invoices for sales and purchases of goods or services.

Compliant e-Invoicing in the Staffing Industry where the focus is on delivery of services by hourly workers looks as follows:

Compliant e-Invoicing for non-product and product related (B.O.M.) goods and material looks as follows:

European-wide infrastructure
European Member States have to design and implement an ICT architecture that supports the exchange of trade related tax data between Tax Authorities of different Member States. Conceptually there are a few scenario’s for realizing such a collaborative infrastructure. These range from totally centralized to decentralized service oriented architectures.

1) a central European Tax reporting and Business Intelligence platform including:
- standardized connections for Businesses to provide tax related transaction data based on the European-specific data exchange standard via a web-enabled portal or data exchange services such as EDI

- a central data warehouse for storage of reported tax related transaction data

- Business Intelligence functionality for Authorities and Businesses to analyze, validate and when needed correct stored information

2) a decentralized country-based architecture including:
- country-specific standards and connections for Businesses to provide tax related transaction data

- decentralized local data warehouses for storage of reported tax related transaction data

- a Business Intelligence solution based on a service oriented architecture that enables analysis and validations of transactions across all Country-specific data warehouses

Conclusions
As many of us realize e-Invoicing is just the first step towards full automation of the supply chain. Only when the latter is accomplished all parties involved will realize the return on investment pursued.

Tax Authorities and/or the CEN/ISSS Work Group should launch a new Task Group in phase 3 that is going to formalize a standard for Tax reporting and define / develop European-wide functionality for processing the tax related transaction data by all Member States as such that they are able to validate cross-company transactions.

Tags: electronic data interchange, HR-XML, e-Invoicing, e-Business, UBL

Last updated: 26-11-2011